Main Page Content:
Daily MailRSS feed
-

Mail finds Gary Glitter spoof ‘appalling’ but too good to ignore

Posted by Axegrinder on 24 November 2008 at 14:47
Tags: Daily Mail, Gary Glitter

Today’s Daily Mail is typically outraged to learn that 15 council staff – including social workers – have been punished or given warnings after they circulated an email image of Gary Glitter carrying a child in a shopping bag.

The Mail article calls the image – which shows the disgraced singer holding a bag with a superimposed child’s face popping out of the top – “sick” and “appalling”.

But obviously not so “sick” and “appalling” that the Mail felt unable to share the picture with its readers.

A helpful sub even put a red circle around the child’s face to assist those slow or short-sighted readers struggling to be offended.

Interestingly, while the paper obscured most of the upper part of the face with a black rectangle, the Mail’s website revealed much more of the anonymous child.

Shocking indeed.

-

Roasted Ramsay not on the menu for The Sun’s Jane Moore

Posted by Axegrinder on 24 November 2008 at 12:34
Tags: Daily Mail, Gary Farrow, Gordon Ramsay, Jane Moore, The Sun, Uncategorized

Tabloid allegations that Gordon Ramsay conducted a seven-year secret affair with a so-called “professional mistress” should provide tasty material for Fleet Street’s unforgiving women columnists (aka the Glenda Slaggs).

But one fears The Sun’s Jane Moore will not be among those giving the potty-mouthed celebrity chef a good kicking.

As Monday’s Daily Mail reminds us, Ramsay’s spokesman is Gary Farrow, head of The Corporation PR agency, which specialises in crisis management. He is also husband of Jane Moore.

Two years ago, when interviewed by The Guardian’s James Silver, she was asked if this meant she would go easy on his clients in her column.

She replied: “Yes, I think you are probably right. I would hold my hand up to that. But then again what I won’t do is praise them… It would be very awkward for me to write something dreadful about one of my husband’s clients. What kind of wife would I be if I went around doing things like that?”

And what kind of journalist, Jane?

-

Was Ann Leslie’s ‘bullying, sexist’ news editor just a ‘pussycat’?

Posted by Axegrinder on 3 November 2008 at 13:41
Tags: Ann Leslie, Celia Lucas, Daily Express, Daily Mail, Derek Taylor, Geoff Mather, Ian Skidmore, John MacDonald, Ken Donlan, Maurice Wigglesworth, Tom Campbell

This is an abbreviated version of a story from the Axegrinder column that appeared in the October issue of Press Gazette magazine. For the full version of November’s column, subscribe now by going to the home page.

Claims by veteran Daily Mail correspondent Ann Leslie that she was bullied by a sexist news editor in her early days as a newspaper reporter have been branded “rubbish” by a contemporary.

In her autobiography, Killing My Own Snakes (Macmillan), Leslie says that what she learnt from her time on the Daily Express in Manchester “was how to see off assorted sexist, bullying men – like news editors”.

Her news editor was “irascible Scot” Tom Campbell. “I was everything he hated: young, a woman, privately educated, a university graduate and, worst of all, someone from the despised South of England. Nothing in my earlier life had equipped me for working with such a man.”

When Leslie was promoted and sent down to the London office, “Campbell became apoplectic. True, he’d wanted to get rid of me from day one – but he didn’t want me to leave in bloody triumph. The only words he addressed to me were, ‘Mark my words, lassie, the editor has made a big mistake!’”

After reading extracts from Leslie’s book in the Daily Mail, author and retired journalist Ian Skidmore told Axegrinder: “Rubbish. Tom Campbell was tough on everyone but they knew it was all on the surface.

“I worked with Tom as a reporter and am still in touch with his contemporaries on the Daily Express. They are united in saying that Ann was a damn good reporter and was appreciated as such by Tom and the editor of the day, John MacDonald.

“Tom looked and acted very fierce, but he was a pussycat. He gave Ann a hard time but no harder than he gave the other reporters who worked for him.

“Her features editor was a man called Geoff Mather, a man of immense culture and kindness. I know he gave her great encouragement, as did her colleague Derek Taylor. She got a column soon after she joined and was transferred to London shortly afterwards. That didn’t happen to a lot of the ‘favoured’ male reporters.

“A little gratitude for those who helped her climb the Fleet Street ladder would not come amiss.”

Skidmore adds that, if Leslie thought she had it bad at the Express, she should have worked on the Mirror. “I was night news editor when Maurice Wigglesworth was news editor. His name for one of our ladies was ‘Pissyknickers’, and he treated her accordingly.

 “I have worked with women reporters – I even married one, Celia Lucas, of the Mail, who worked under Ken Donlan, about as hard a man as you could meet. I never heard one of them complain about the attitude of men. Indeed it would be a brave man who took them on.”

-

Ross and Brand prank call not too disgusting for Daily Mail website

Posted by Axegrinder on 29 October 2008 at 09:46
Tags: Daily Mail, Jonathan Ross, Russell Brand, dailymail.co.uk

“Incredibly, the BBC judged the pre-recorded stunt fit to be broadcast on radio,” gasped a Daily Mail leader column on Tuesday about the Russell Brand/Jonathan Ross affair.

“Do they care nothing… about the sensibilities of ordinary listeners and licence-fee-payers?” added the editorial.

And in an op-ed piece, Sir Gerald Kaufman condemned the BBC for allowing transmission of the “deeply unpleasant” item.

Meanwhile, a certain newspaper decided that it was not so unpleasant that it couldn’t be played on its website, by means of a YouTube video of the offending phone calls to Andrew Sachs, plus a transcript.

Which newspaper website apparently cared “nothing… about the sensibilities of ordinary listeners” and rebroadcast the “disgusting” and “outrageously offensive” item?

Why dailymail.co.uk, of course.

Next Posts

-

Advertisement

E-mail Newsletter Signup

-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement