Main Page Content:
The GuardianRSS feed
-

Video: How the Scott Trust remit included the Observer in 2004

Posted by Axegrinder on 7 September 2009 at 14:42
Tags: The Guardian, The Observer

A Guardian promotional video has landed in my in-box dating from around 2004 - happier days for The Guardian and Observer.

Back then it seems that Guardian Newspapers boss at the time Carolyn McCall (now chief executive of Guardian Media Group) had a different take on the remit of the Scott Trust from the current interpretation.

She says: “The whole purpose of the Scott Trust is to ensure that The Guardian and The Observer exist in perpetuity - that they are totally independent, they can say what they want and behave the way they want without a proprietor. That is a fantastic thing and we think it gives us a great loyalty with not only with our readers but also with our staff.”

Fast-forward to 2009 and McCall is considering closing The Observer to stem GMG losses and safeguard the future of journalism of The Guardian “in perpetuity”.

-

Guardian’s rethink over who “calls the shots” at Indy

Posted by Axegrinder on 13 July 2009 at 22:47
Tags: John Mulholland, Roger Alton, Simon Kelner, The Guardian, The Observer

The reappearance of Simon Kelner in today’s Media Guardian 100, the “definitive guide to the people who really matter in the media”, will surely have left some members of the selection panel rather red-faced.

Why? Go back 12 months and this is how the Guardian justified removing from the list the Independent managing director and editor-in-chief, and introducing Indy editor Roger Alton at No. 48: “It is Alton who now wields the power at the daily paper, said our panel, not Kelner. ‘Roger has still got it all to do but I think he will put the Independent on the map,’ said one panellist. ‘Alton is the one that matters, not Kelner. He is the one calling the shots.”

But what is the panel saying now? “Events of the past 12 months have thrust him [Kelner] firmly back into centre stage.” Which can also be translated as: “The panel really made an utter balls-up of this one.”

Kelner returns at No. 57. Alton is kicked off the list.

Meanwhile, The Guardian puts current Observer editor John Mulholland firmly in his place by once again failing to include him in the top 100. The editors of The Sunday Times and Mail on Sunday win a place but the Guardian’s stablemate is snubbed. While Alton was in charge of The Obs, he was always included on the list.

-

Bruno causes utter umlaut confusion at The Guardian

Posted by Axegrinder on 21 June 2009 at 23:49
Tags: The Guardian

Sacha Baron Cohen isn’t just upsetting sections of the gay community with his latest movie, Brüno. He’s causing all manner of confusion for sub-editors at The Guardian.

First, subs received this email:

A note about Brüno’s umlaut

Hello - it looks like our diligence with the umlaut may be scuppering

our SEO, as everyone’s searching without umlaut.

So please could you leave out the umlaut from headline, link-text, standfirst, trail and slugwords.

Many thanks

Catherine

Next came this:

Re: A note about Brüno’s umlaut

Just clarify that:

- we should still use the umlaut in print headlines.

- we should launch web stories without the umlaut in the furniture

- once the article appears on Google*, we should update the furniture and put the umlaut back in.

* you can check this by searching for the headline in quote marks on Google.

thanks

Celine

Finally (or possibly not), subs received this:

SUBS  PLEASE READ:

Bruno’s umlaut -  update

Hello,

re: Sacha Baron Cohen’s film Brüno

In a change to last night’s instruction, from now on please do not use an umlaut in the headlines and furniture for web stories.

Print headlines should still use the umlaut however.

Web subs, you can change headlines on front pages to include the umlaut.

thanks

Celine

-

Will Tanya Gold be banned from her friend’s wedding?

Posted by Axegrinder on 11 June 2009 at 17:27
Tags: Tanya Gold, The Guardian, Uncategorized

I fear hackette Tanya Gold is about to lose another friend … all because she felt the need to tell Guardian readers how she hates wedding lists.

On Wednesday she wrote: “Three weeks I ago I received a wedding list from a friend. Let me be more accurate. She used to be a friend, but as her wedding looms she has been replaced by a shape-shifting, John Lewis-icking monster.”

The friend’s error was to want “ice-crushers and cookbook holders and spoons. Give them to me, she squawks through her John Lewis proxy, because I am in love - and that means I get consumer durables for free! I demand a new kitchen - and you will pay for it!”

Gold favours another type of wedding gift.

“I will take my friend out for dinner … Although I suspect she will probably stick the cutlery in her bag and take it home.”

When the article appeared on the Guardian website, it didn’t take long for Gold’s poor friend to deliver her verdict. In a comment posted on Wednesday lunchtime (a time when the hungry hack was unlikely to be at her computer), someone called Jo Holland wrote:

“As the bride referred to in the piece I should point out that Tanya was invited to my wedding but no wedding list was included in her invitation because I know how much she hates them.

“I do have a wedding list at John Lewis which I can appreciate is bourgeois but we decided that it would be practical, though by no means compulsory. The irony in all this is that I really, really don’t care about gifts and have never even brought the subject up with Tanya (my dress, I concede is another matter). It might sound trite but all I want is a happy unforgettable day surrounded by people I love. My wedding is less than a month away and frankly, Tanya I don’t want any spoons but I’m not sure that I want you at my wedding either.”

Oh dear, another weekend at home beckons for poor old Tanya.

-

Time for a change of tactics for Guardian sports subs

Posted by Axegrinder on 4 May 2009 at 21:57
Tags: The Guardian

Are sports subs on The Guardian following some new style edict or have they simply become stuck in a rut when it comes to writing headlines? Whatever the reason, there’s something horribly formulaic about the headlines. Just take a look at these, all taken from Monday’s sports section.

 

gdn2 by you.

gdn8 by you.gdn4 by you.gdn1 by you.gdn7 by you.gdn3 by you.gdn6 by you.gdn5 by you.

-

The Guardian’s ‘enthusiastic porn star’

Posted by Axegrinder on 8 April 2009 at 10:06
Tags: Jemima Kiss, The Guardian

The following story appeared in the April edition of Press Gazette

Jemima Kiss of The Guardian swears like an “enthusiastic porn star”, according to the website cursebird, which analyses the content of potty-mouthed Twitter users. Her ranking was probably helped by this joke she shared with followers: “Two dyslexics in a house. First one says: can you smell gas? 2nd replies: Fuck off, I can barely smell my own name.”

-

Heffer gets the hump over homophone horrors

Posted by Axegrinder on 9 March 2009 at 10:11
Tags: Daily Telegraph, Peter Wilby, Simon Heffer, The Guardian

In his previous email to subs and reporters, Telegraph style guru Simon Heffer issued relatively mild rebukes for various misdemeanours, but this month he is clearly back to his usual angry self.

He points out that the Telegraph website is “habitually printing homophones of the words we intended to write because of writers’ failure to superintend the spell checker. Here are just a few: who’s for whose; plumb for plum; hyperthermia for hypothermia; diffuse for defuse; there for their; it’s for its; reign for rain; hole for whole; well-healed for well-heeled; and the misuse of each of pallet, palate and palette. “

Axegrinder suspects subs writing headlines about Holocaust-denying Bishop Richard Williamson will not be helped by Heffer’s advice on how to describe him. “He is not a Roman Catholic bishop; he is a bishop of the Society of St Pius who happens to be a Roman Catholic. His excommunication has been reversed but he is not yet in communion with the church.”

Heffer then lists a series of recent errors, including:

“Not all Tories are grandees; only very senior ones with established power and influence in the party.”

“A car cannot collide with a tree: the tree would have to be moving too, which it usually isn’t.”

“To refute something is not the same as to reject it. “

Phenomena is a plural.”

“The plural of foot is feet: phrases like “six foot tall” are unacceptable.”

Gotten is a word in the America language, but not the English one.”

Going forward is banned: in the future is an acceptable substitute.”

 And the award for the Telegraph’s factual error of the month would have to go to the following: “Most embarrassingly, we asserted that ‘dozens’ of men had died with Captain Scott at the South Pole. The latter was an error in a press release. It goes without saying that any fact encountered in a press release or in agency copy should not be considered as accurate until the writer has verified it is so.”

UPDATE: In his ‘On the press’ column in today’s Guardian, Peter Wilby takes Heffer to task for allowing the Telegraph to refer to “Lord Peter Goldsmith” rather than simply “Lord Goldsmith”. “[We] lefties don’t care for archaic titles and regard such rules as pettifogging detail. You’d expect the Telegraph to observe them scrupulously… Wake up, Heffer!”

In fact, Heffer’s latest email on style contains the following: “We had a reference to Lord Paul Myners. He isn’t. He is Lord Myners. He would be Lord Paul Myners only if he were the younger son of a duke or a marquess whose family name was Myners.”

Wilby, Heffer is wide awake.

 

-

Guardian’s Jemima Kiss is left wanting more

Posted by Axegrinder on 8 March 2009 at 21:18
Tags: Jemima Kiss, The Guardian, The Observer

Guardian and Observer staff may have shiny new offices to work in but management had better note: hungry journalists are not happy journalists. 

Guardian reporter and digital publishing guru Jemima Kiss has revealed she is not in love with the fare being served up in the office canteen. 

She Twittered: “There’s obviously a credit crunch in the Guardian canteen. Admittedly I do have a big appetite but seriously guys – sparrow portions.” 

It’s not the first time Kiss has moaned about the grub on offer. Last month she told her followers: “Going on a mission to find decent fish and chips as our canteen has a batter FAIL.”

Axegrinder hesitates to mention it but perhaps her “big appetite” can be forgiven. We understand she is, as they say, eating for two.

-

Guardian forgets the most famous flaming victim of all – its very own Max Gogarty

Posted by Axegrinder on 9 February 2009 at 16:27
Tags: Emily Gould, James Silver, Max Gogarty, New York Times Magazine, Paul Gogarty, The Guardian, The Independent, Yasmin Alibhai-Brown

Monday’s Guardian carries an interesting piece by James Silver about flaming, “where hostile messages about writers are posted on forums or blogs”. 

For those unaware of this new phenomenon, Silver explains that this is feedback from readers that is “instant, ubiquitous, and sometimes downright unpleasant — with some comment threads on the web quickly turning into a feeding frenzy”. 

He cites examples involving writers Emily Gould of the New York Times Magazine and Yasmin Alibhai-Brown of The Independent.

But strangely he makes no mention of the most famous recent example of a British writer being flamed into silence — Max Gogarty and his unfortunate gap year travel blog that appeared … on The Guardian’s website

For those with short memories, last February the Guardian unveiled Gogarty under the headline “Max, 19, hits the road” and this standfirst: “Meet Max Gogarty, 19, from north London, spends his money on food, booze and skinny jeans, writes for Skins in his spare time. He’s off to India and Thailand to have a good time, and you can join him in his weekly blog.”

Sadly, the blog lasted just one day, perhaps chiefly because the Guardian upset its senstive readers by forgetting to mention that Max is the son of Paul Gogarty, whose byline is seen frequently on the paper’s travel pages.

Accusations of nepotism featured often among the 10 pages of readers’ comments that appeared before the thread was closed within 24 hours of Max making his debut as a Guardian blogger.

For some reason readers failed to warm to Max’s prose, including gems such as: “I’m kinda shitting myself about travelling”, “I’ll do my best to tell of the debauched beach parties” and “every one I’ve spoken to is making no secret of the fact that Thailand should be pretty damn decadent”.

The flamers reacted instantly with comments such as: “who’s [sic] son is max then? terrible terrible terrible, shame on you guardian”; “the cynic in me is asking, how come Max has managed to get his own blog to write about the same thing that thousands do each year?”; “Oh Christ, this guy’s going to get an absolute hammering”; “Great to see nepotism is alive and well” and “This must be a joke. This guy is going to be torn to shreds. Either someone is very naive or it is pure genius – the blog and resulting comments has the potential to be one of the most amusing things on the web.”

And indeed that is what it became, and there are still two Facebook groups honouring Max’s brief but never-to-be-forgotten blog.

Twelve months on, surely it’s time the Guardian told us what became of poor Max.

 

 

 

 

-

‘the’ Observer brought down to size by Guardian group’s new integrated style guide

Posted by Axegrinder on 19 December 2008 at 14:03
Tags: Amelia Hodsdon, Bob Poulton, David Marsh, The Guardian, The Observer

So farewell then, ‘The Observer’. Say hello to ‘the Observer’.

The loss of the upper-case ‘t’ from the Sunday paper’s title is just one of the changes resulting from the unveiling today of a unified style guide for the Observer, the Guardian and guardian.co.uk.

Axegrinder hears that some people at the company’s new Kings Cross home regard this little change as symbolising the paper’s overall defeat in the style wars. The new “integrated” guide has been edited by a duo from the Guardian, David Marsh, assistant editor, production, and Amelia Hodson, a senior sub-editor.

Earlier today, subs on the Obs received an email from Bob Poulton, the Sunday paper’s production editor, announcing: “The Observer and Guardian style guides have been integrated with effect from this week. The revisions have been agreed by a working group representing the Observer, the Guardian and guardian.co.uk.

“This is a necessary step for cross-platform working and web publishing. In some cases, the Observer (note the lower case t) has adopted Guardian style; in others, the Guardian has adopted Observer style; in yet others, style has been updated and is different from former Observer and Guardian styles.”

Poulton then lists the “most significant entries and changes” for Observer subs. These are as follows (non-subs, look away now, for you will surely die of boredom):

accents as well as French and German, use on Spanish and Irish words, and proper names in any language where possible

act caps for name of act, eg Official Secrets Act

Andalucía

antisemitic

apostrophes follow Observer style with possessives and always use ’s, rather than be guided by pronunciation, eg Dickens’s house, Gallas’s own goal, Jesus’s disciples

art movements generally l/c: art deco, art nouveau, cubism, dadaism, expressionism, gothic, impressionism, pop art, surrealism etc*but Bauhaus, Modern (in the sense of Modern British, to distinguish it from “modern art”), pre-Raphaelite, Romantic (to differentiate between a romantic painting and a Romantic painting) 

barbecue 

billion £3bn, 3bn apples but 3 billion people (and same for million)

bogy (ghost, menace), bogey (golf), bogie (truck)

book titles the Observer retains italics for titles of books etc; guardian.co.uk does not, so subs need to change italics to roman for the web and vice versa (and same for film titles, magazines, newspapers etc)

capitals as Guardian style (see full entry in style guide) - note that prime minister etc now l/c

census

cold war (and most other wars) l/c

dashes the en dash (option-hyphen), as already used by the Observer, will replace both the em dash used by the Guardian and the short dash (hyphen) used by guardian.co.uk

dates as Observer style - note that the week for all our publications now starts on Sunday

decades 80s etc

eg, ie etc no full points

encyclopedia not aedia

foreign names Le/De/Di/Van have initial caps when used without first name, eg Ruud van Nistelrooy becomes Van Nistelrooy on subsequent mentions

Gaddafi is the new style for both Observer and Guardian

hip-hop

Hezbollah is the new style for both Observer and Guardian

job titles all l/c

Kathmandu

Land Rover no hyphen

Luxembourgeois live in Luxembourg

Marrakech

No 10

the Observer not The Observer (and same for all newspapers)

% not per cent (in both text and furniture)

president Barack Obama, the US president, but President Barack Obama

pin number

privy council, privy counsellor

al-Qaida not al-Qaeda

quotation marks use double quotation marks, with single marks inside - “David described this policy as ’sensible’, although not everyone agreed.”

Qu’ran not Koran

register office (until now the Observer has been capping this up)

stock exchange, stockmarket

third world l/c if you must (but developing countries preferable)

verbs end in -ed for past tense (he burned the cakes), -t for past participle (the cakes were burnt)

the west

Previous Posts

-

Advertisement

E-mail Newsletter Signup

-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement