Main Page Content:
-

NUJ should stop the political posturing and look at the key issues

Posted by Press Gazette on 17 April 2007 at 12:19
Tags: Israel, Journalism, NUJ, Press Gazette Leaders

There often comes a point at NUJ Annual Delegate Meetings where – to an outsider – proceedings can appear disconnected from reality.

This correspondent recalls being at ADMs where the union has decided to affiliate itself to the Cuba Solidarity Campaign. This is notwithstanding the fact that, according to Reporters Without Borders, Cuba imprisons more journalists than any other country in the world with the exception of China.

In April 2003, at the NUJ conference in Llandudno, delegates voted unanimously to oppose the war in Iraq. The entire conference walked out en-masse to stage a silent protest by standing in a line on the seafront – with hindsight the protest may have proved to be a prescient one, but at the time it was by no means representative of much more divided opinions in newsrooms up and down the country.

On Friday at this year’s ADM, the NUJ delegates voted, 66 to 54, for a boycott of Israeli goods in protest against “aggression” in Palestinian territories.

It was a motion driven mainly by activists drawn from the far left of the union – a group whose influence at ADM far outweighs their strength in the membership as a whole.
While the far left fringe add much to the strength of the union with their activism and enthusiasm, it is this kind of political posturing which still puts many journalists off joining the NUJ.

There is so much that the vast majority of journalists can agree on: the need for fairer wages, especially in the regional press; the defence of press freedom; the improvement of ethical and professional standards; the need to protect good editorial resources in the face of commercial pressure.

The NUJ should concentrate on these issues, and when it comes to international matters concentrate on protecting journalism and press freedom worldwide, instead of forming positions on highly divisive geo-political conflicts which risk alienating the rank-and-file membership.

Tags: Israel, Journalism, NUJ, Press Gazette Leaders

CommentsRSS feed for the comments on this post

Add your own comment

  1. martin cloake |  17 April 2007 at 1.17pm

    Or, alternatively, people could chose to focus on the basic issues the NUJ does concentrate on and achieve success over, and stop blowing sideshows up into far greater significance than they really have. But that wouldn’t make for quite as sexy a story, would it?

  2. Dominic Ponsford |  17 April 2007 at 2.07pm

    For a full three-page report on this year’s ADM detailing all the issues that were debated I recommend this week’s Press Gazette magazine!
    Available to subscribers on Thursday and in newsagents on Friday.

  3. martin cloake |  17 April 2007 at 5.03pm

    Nifty footwork. I suppose I don’t get a prize for guessing what the main story will be? ;-)

  4. Media Backspin&hellip |  19 April 2007 at 8.36am

    [...] Pansford of the Press Gazette, a UK media journal, lays out why the NUJ’s shameful boycott doesn’t represent the majority of the [...]

  5. unseen |  19 April 2007 at 4.51pm

    Last week the National Union of Journalists (NUJ) endorsed a motion to encourage its members to boycott Israeli goods. The margin of victory was small; the significance of the vote was not. Many NUJ members have contacted Engage to help overturn the motion. So we are setting up a list for those NUJ members who would like to become involved.

    Sign up at http://www.mailmylist.co.uk/nuj/

    http://www.engageonline.org.uk/blog/article.php?id=965

  6. seamus dooley |  20 April 2007 at 7.51am

    Your memory is faulty. Yes ADM passed a motion opposing the war. However the minute’s silence at the conference in 2003 was not a protest against the war. ADM delegates were invited to observe the minute’s silence in memory of all who had died, without distinction. It was a dignified tribute - not a mass walkout.

    Seamus Dooley

  7. Mike |  26 April 2007 at 2.17am

    I agree with the article. My political sympathies could probably be described as radical and progressive, but I object to my trade union adopting a political line, especially when that union specialises in journalism. Journalists should be free to adopt and express their own, independently-formulated opinions, no matter how much others may object or dissapprove.

Leave a Comment

required

required, but will not be published

-

Advertisement

E-mail Newsletter Signup

-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement