Main Page Content:
SubbingRSS feed
-

Your chance to sub-edit the journalism of Charles Dickens

Posted by Dominic Ponsford on 6 May 2011 at 11:40
Tags: Journalism, Journalists, Sub editors, Subbing, new media

The University of Buckingham is calling on Press Gazette readers to help it  mark Charles Dickens’ 200th birthday next February by sub-editing a huge archive of his journalism.

It has digitised Household Words and All The Year Round – the two magazines Dickens edited from 1850 until his death in 1870. And it has used text-recognition software to turn those scanned pages into words.

But each computer-generated transcript contains a number of errors and needs a human to put them right. That’s where you come in!

It’s an exercise in crowd-sourcing which has so far seen less than  10 per cent of the pages completed.

Although the articles are all un-bylined – this project could lead to a number of new Dickens works coming to light because other computer jiggery pokery is going to be deployed to identify pieces written by the great man based on identifiable patterns in his writing style.

The magazines sold between 40,000 and 100,000 copies a week and were thought to have about 30 readers per copy. This was in the days when a daily newspaper was reckoned to be motoring if it sold more than 10,000 copies.

There are more than a thousand 24-page magazines to correct – including some which serialised some of Dickens’ greatest works.

As an aside, apparently Dickens made around £170,000 a year from his magazines in today’s money – providing him with the bulk of his income. And staff-wise he had just two partners and a printer – no publisher or commercial team. An inspiration to journalists going it alone with their own publications today.

Click here to sign up with the Dickens Journal Online scheme.

-

Quick draw Sun subs nail art-attack headline

Posted by Dominic Ponsford on 31 July 2009 at 10:36
Tags: National Newspapers, Sub editors, Subbing, Sun, newspapers

No sooner has Press Gazette relaunched its headline of the month competition, than a story breaks which is a headline writer’s dream.

Mugger Lloyd Talbot was jailed after the retired art-teacher he attacked provided police with a portrait of her attacker.

Here’s how the headline writers handled it:

The Daily Star: DREW DUNNIT!

Daily Mirror: IN THE FRAME

Daily Express: Quick on the draw

My favourite?

The Sun with: LONG ARM OF THE DRAW

While the Daily Mail went for the less fun option of: Artists’s sketch nails her mugger.

-

Free single malt whisky for sub-editors: Yes, really….

Posted by Dominic Ponsford on 29 July 2009 at 13:42
Tags: David Montgomery, Roy Greenslade, Sub editors, Subbing

Industry bigwigs have been queuing up to stick the boot in to sub-editors in recent years – with media luminaries ranging from David Montgomery to Roy Greenslade proposing a ‘final solution’ to journalism’s economic woes with the elimination of sub-editors.

But as Axegrinder and Grey Cardigan have recently been pointing out – the results of such cost-cutting can be calamitous.

Press Gazette says enough is enough: It’s time to save our subs, and cherish the work they do.

With this end in mind we have relaunched Press Gazette magazine’s much-missed headline of the month competition – which was also recently reprised by All Media Scotland.

And thanks to some generous sponsorship we can offer the winning headline writer, and the colleague who nominates them, a bottle of Jura single malt whisky every month.

As if that’s not enough, we are also launching a new headline of the year contest. The winner of that will win an exclusive weekend away on the Isle of Jura where George Orwell wrote 1984, with the colleague who nominates the winning headline to receive a bottle of exclusive 1974 Jura whisky which is worth £500 a bottle.

So to hell with search engine optimisation: Press Gazette is looking for headlines which show wit, intelligence and craft while grabbing the reader’s attention.

Nominations should be sent to dominicp@pressgazette.co.uk.

Entries are welcomed from all sectors of journalism – print and online.

-

Dash or semi-colon? Ban them both

Posted by Dominic Ponsford on 5 May 2009 at 07:00
Tags: Subbing, newspapers

Never mind the debate over the future of the regional press and public service broadcasting. The latest issue of Standpoint magazine has tackled an issue which we journalists can really get stuck into.

It’s the dash versus the semi-colon.

Citing an example from the Sunday Telegraph of the increasing use in journalism of the em-dash, Lionel Shriver writes that it is “a punctuation mark that is raging through contemporary prose as rapaciously as clostridium difficile is contaminating our hospitals…The em-dash is eating semicolons for breakfast.”

And she has a point. I’ve been guilty myself. But no more.

As for the semi-colon, I have to say that I am with Kurt Vonnegut on that one. As he said:

“Here is a lesson in creative writing. First rule: Do not use semicolons. They are transvestite hermaphrodites representing absolutely nothing. All they do is show you’ve been to college.”

While I have absolutely nothing against hermaphrodites, I do agree that semi-colons are neither fish nor fowl. And what’s more they are ugly.

They have absolutely no place in a news story, and very little place in a news feature.

Journalists should keep it simple. Commas and full-stops should suffice. Sometimes semi-colons are unavoidable, such as when you are writing complicated lists, but overall they are to be avoided. Especially in, God forbid, intros.

Over-use of the em-dash does encourage a sloppy approach to grammar, so let’s ban them too. Or at least use them a lot less.

-

Advertisement

E-mail Newsletter Signup

-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement