<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are email interviews &#8217;stilted, over-rehearsed, and evasive&#8217;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.pressgazette.co.uk/fleetstreet/2007/04/24/are-email-interviews-stilted-over-rehearsed-and-evasive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.pressgazette.co.uk/fleetstreet/2007/04/24/are-email-interviews-stilted-over-rehearsed-and-evasive/</link>
	<description>Signposts to journalism's future from Press Gazette</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 04:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Email interviews: Love or hate?: Freelancewritingtips.com</title>
		<link>http://blogs.pressgazette.co.uk/fleetstreet/2007/04/24/are-email-interviews-stilted-over-rehearsed-and-evasive/#comment-55256</link>
		<dc:creator>Email interviews: Love or hate?: Freelancewritingtips.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 09:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.pressgazette.co.uk/fleetstreet/2007/04/24/are-email-interviews-stilted-over-rehearsed-and-evasive/#comment-55256</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] CAN'T be doing with email interviews - but still use them, sparingly. I recently carried out an interview in this way because my subject [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] CAN&#8217;T be doing with email interviews - but still use them, sparingly. I recently carried out an interview in this way because my subject [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Media interviews: forget email</title>
		<link>http://blogs.pressgazette.co.uk/fleetstreet/2007/04/24/are-email-interviews-stilted-over-rehearsed-and-evasive/#comment-49858</link>
		<dc:creator>Media interviews: forget email</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.pressgazette.co.uk/fleetstreet/2007/04/24/are-email-interviews-stilted-over-rehearsed-and-evasive/#comment-49858</guid>
		<description>[...] it may seem so on the face of, that leading technology magazine, Wired won’t conduct interviews by email is no [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it may seem so on the face of, that leading technology magazine, Wired won’t conduct interviews by email is no [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Notes from a Teacher: Mark on Media &#187; Wednesday squibs</title>
		<link>http://blogs.pressgazette.co.uk/fleetstreet/2007/04/24/are-email-interviews-stilted-over-rehearsed-and-evasive/#comment-49829</link>
		<dc:creator>Notes from a Teacher: Mark on Media &#187; Wednesday squibs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 01:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.pressgazette.co.uk/fleetstreet/2007/04/24/are-email-interviews-stilted-over-rehearsed-and-evasive/#comment-49829</guid>
		<description>[...] on what works and doesn&#8217;t. Front link is to Mathew Ingram. Other comments worthy of note: Martin Stabe and Dan [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on what works and doesn&#8217;t. Front link is to Mathew Ingram. Other comments worthy of note: Martin Stabe and Dan [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Stabe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.pressgazette.co.uk/fleetstreet/2007/04/24/are-email-interviews-stilted-over-rehearsed-and-evasive/#comment-49750</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 07:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.pressgazette.co.uk/fleetstreet/2007/04/24/are-email-interviews-stilted-over-rehearsed-and-evasive/#comment-49750</guid>
		<description>Danny,

Yes, I was thinking about that while writing the post. I think it's a good compromise for situations like this. There's a permanent and complete record for both parties, and it has the immediacy of a phone call.

Another compromise -- hinted at in Calacanis's comments -- is the Tony Benn policy of both sides tape recording the interview, but that may not be possible for everyone because it's usually only the journalists who have their phones set up to be wired into automatic recording software (or even plain old tape recorders).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Danny,</p>
<p>Yes, I was thinking about that while writing the post. I think it&#8217;s a good compromise for situations like this. There&#8217;s a permanent and complete record for both parties, and it has the immediacy of a phone call.</p>
<p>Another compromise &#8212; hinted at in Calacanis&#8217;s comments &#8212; is the Tony Benn policy of both sides tape recording the interview, but that may not be possible for everyone because it&#8217;s usually only the journalists who have their phones set up to be wired into automatic recording software (or even plain old tape recorders).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2007-04-25 &#171; David Black</title>
		<link>http://blogs.pressgazette.co.uk/fleetstreet/2007/04/24/are-email-interviews-stilted-over-rehearsed-and-evasive/#comment-49728</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2007-04-25 &#171; David Black</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 02:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.pressgazette.co.uk/fleetstreet/2007/04/24/are-email-interviews-stilted-over-rehearsed-and-evasive/#comment-49728</guid>
		<description>[...] Press Gazette Blogs - Fleet Street 2.0 » Are email interviews ’stilted, over-rehearsed, and evasi... &#8220;A high-profile blogger’s concern about being misquoted is understandable — but so is a journalist’s concern about having an less-than-ideal interview medium dictated to them.&#8221; (tags: internet journalism interviews blogging email) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Press Gazette Blogs - Fleet Street 2.0 » Are email interviews ’stilted, over-rehearsed, and evasi&#8230; &#8220;A high-profile blogger’s concern about being misquoted is understandable — but so is a journalist’s concern about having an less-than-ideal interview medium dictated to them.&#8221; (tags: internet journalism interviews blogging email) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Sanchez</title>
		<link>http://blogs.pressgazette.co.uk/fleetstreet/2007/04/24/are-email-interviews-stilted-over-rehearsed-and-evasive/#comment-49724</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Sanchez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 01:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.pressgazette.co.uk/fleetstreet/2007/04/24/are-email-interviews-stilted-over-rehearsed-and-evasive/#comment-49724</guid>
		<description>Any thoughts on IM interviews?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any thoughts on IM interviews?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: /public relations /media /blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.pressgazette.co.uk/fleetstreet/2007/04/24/are-email-interviews-stilted-over-rehearsed-and-evasive/#comment-49794</link>
		<dc:creator>/public relations /media /blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.pressgazette.co.uk/fleetstreet/2007/04/24/are-email-interviews-stilted-over-rehearsed-and-evasive/#comment-49794</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt; Read this    Are email interviews ?stilted, over-rehearsed, and evasive??PR 2.0 is PR 1.0 - againBaker plans Commons vigil to see off FOI exemption for MPsMore MEN redundancies in the air…How should journalists use social media material?MySpace News launch expectedMedia critics look at online Virginia Tech coverage&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%--> Read this    Are email interviews ?stilted, over-rehearsed, and evasive??PR 2.0 is PR 1.0 - againBaker plans Commons vigil to see off FOI exemption for MPsMore MEN redundancies in the air…How should journalists use social media material?MySpace News launch expectedMedia critics look at online Virginia Tech coverage<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Burton</title>
		<link>http://blogs.pressgazette.co.uk/fleetstreet/2007/04/24/are-email-interviews-stilted-over-rehearsed-and-evasive/#comment-51895</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Burton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.pressgazette.co.uk/fleetstreet/2007/04/24/are-email-interviews-stilted-over-rehearsed-and-evasive/#comment-51895</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt; Take note (or should i say notes)  Have I missed something or are we really, seriously, debating the merits of the email interview?. &lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%--> Take note (or should i say notes)  Have I missed something or are we really, seriously, debating the merits of the email interview?. <!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristine Lowe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.pressgazette.co.uk/fleetstreet/2007/04/24/are-email-interviews-stilted-over-rehearsed-and-evasive/#comment-53379</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristine Lowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.pressgazette.co.uk/fleetstreet/2007/04/24/are-email-interviews-stilted-over-rehearsed-and-evasive/#comment-53379</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;answer questions from a journalist and instead wrote a comment to the article on the site [his blog]."   I guess that is somewhat reminiscent of the recent debate about A-list bloggers who'd rather blog answers to journalists' question, or conduct the interviews via email. Should disintermediation be the sole privilege of bloggers?    &lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->answer questions from a journalist and instead wrote a comment to the article on the site [his blog].&#8221;   I guess that is somewhat reminiscent of the recent debate about A-list bloggers who&#8217;d rather blog answers to journalists&#8217; question, or conduct the interviews via email. Should disintermediation be the sole privilege of bloggers?    <!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Stabe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.pressgazette.co.uk/fleetstreet/2007/04/24/are-email-interviews-stilted-over-rehearsed-and-evasive/#comment-53380</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.pressgazette.co.uk/fleetstreet/2007/04/24/are-email-interviews-stilted-over-rehearsed-and-evasive/#comment-53380</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;   [IMG]  &lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->   [IMG]  <!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
