Main Page Content:
-

This is not a ‘blog’ (it’s just part of one)

Posted by Martin Stabe on 26 June 2007 at 08:56
Tags: Blogs, blogging

RBI’s blogging supremo Adam Tinworth says he has given up on trying to correct people’s incorrect use of blogging terminology:

In my day to day work, aiding and abetting blogging journalists, and as I read around blogs in general it’s becoming clear that, to most people, a blog is a post on such a site … Yes, each individual entry is a “blog”, and the site is called something like a “blog site”.

Tinworth worries that he is “turning into the electronic equivalent of the old geezer in the pub moaning about kids today and how they don’t understand anything” by trying to insist that a site itself is a “blog” while each story on it is a “post” or “entry”.

I hope he reconsiders and returns to taking a hard line on this. After all, “blog” (both as a noun and verb) has been a proper word in the OED since March 2003. It defines the noun as being short for “web log”, which in turn, is defined as:

“A frequently updated web site consisting of personal observations, excerpts from other sources, etc., typically run by a single person, and usually with hyperlinks to other sites; an online journal or diary” (OED 2003).

Other dictionaries agree that a blog is a type of web site, rather than parts of such a site.
Anyone interested in the struggles to define the term over the last few years should read danah boyd’s article on the subject.

Calling a “post” a “blog” is to confuse the sum and its parts. Pedantic subs wouldn’t stand for this sort of thing in any other context. Right, I’m off to go work on a few “magazines” — sorry, “stories” — now.

Tags: Blogs, blogging

CommentsRSS feed for the comments on this post

Add your own comment

  1. Best of the journalism bl&hellip |  30 November 1999 at 12:00am

    Roy Greenslade points us to a column by Janet Street-Porter in the Independent which makes the extraordinary claim that Internet chatrooms cause suicide. Her argument appears to be that the Interne… This is not a ‘blog’ (it’s just part of one) RBI’s blogging supremo Adam Tinworth says he has given up on trying to correct people’s incorrect use of blogging terminology: In my day to day work, aiding and abetting blogging journalists, and a…

  2. Martin Stabe&hellip |  30 November 1999 at 12:00am

    [IMG]

  3. Mike Butcher |  26 June 2007 at 9:23am

    Having trained a number of RBI journos to blog during several courses in 2005, I can vouch for his view that many newbie blogger journos don’t get it. They continue to not get it mainly because they tend not to bury their head in the theory and conversations about blogging which happen in the tech space, but don;t happen much in the media space.

  4. Bobbie Johnson |  26 June 2007 at 11:17am

    I was talking about this the other day, after I suddenly caught myself saying “I enjoyed that blog you wrote the other day” to somebody. It’s something picked up from hanging around with newbie bloggers; but obviously the change has set in, at least partially, in my head.

    I have been pretty hardline about this in the past - blog, post, comment - but it’s increasingly problematic because we all tend to say “oh, yes I blogged that” rather than “I posted about that on a blog”.

    Thing is, language isn’t immutable, even for subs (yes, I know). And while you might write stories instead of make magazines, the publisher DOES make magazines. So if I’m my own publisher, the line becomes very muddy. And people do “make TV”, “make radio” (as shorthand for TV programmes, radio programmes etc). Oh, it’s a tricky old thing isn’t it.

  5. Martin Stabe |  26 June 2007 at 11:24am

    I don’t have a problem with “blogged” as the past tense of “to blog”.

    Ultimately, that derives from “logged”, which is a perfectly legitimate verb for adding an entry to a log… or a post to a blog, therefore.

    Language may not be immutable, but I wish it to be consistent in some way, even if this is obviously impossible. Maybe it has something to do with the fact that I sit in a corner surrounded by subeditors at work.

  6. Adam |  26 June 2007 at 1:24pm

    I think, as one of the commenters on my post pointed out, that the worst aspect of this is that there really is no good replacement word for “blog” in its traditional sense. “Blog site” is just horrible.

    OK, you’ve convinced me. I’ll return to my no-tolerance stance.

Leave a Comment

required

required, but will not be published

-

Advertisement

E-mail Newsletter Signup

-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement