Main Page Content:
Contempt of CourtRSS feed
-

Contempt charges for video blogger

Posted by Martin Stabe on 19 September 2006 at 09:51
Tags: Blogs, Contempt of Court, Ethics, Journalism, Sources, Vodcasting

A video blogger in California lost his appeal over contempt charges after he refused to turn over video he shot at a demonstration. Joshua Wolf, 24, had filmed a G8 demonstration in San Francisco which turned violent. Wolf is currently free on bail, but federal prosecutors have filed a motion to have him jailed while the appeals process continues.

Update: Wolf’s bail has been revoked.

-

Bloggers get ‘fake sheikh’ writs, too

Posted by Martin Stabe on 6 April 2006 at 14:31
Tags: Blogs, Contempt of Court, Freedom of Expression, Injunctions, Journalism, Media Law, News of the World, copyright

Bloggers who published the pictures of News of the World investigations editor Mazher Mahmood that George Galloway distributed earlier this week have been hit with the same injunction that other media, including Press Gazette, received from Screws lawyers on Tuesday.

Journalist Alex Hilton, who blogs under the name Recess Monkey, removed the picture from his web site after receiving the injunction, but has posted a version of the image digitally altered to show Mahmood disguised as Che Guevarra.

Pseudonymous blogger Guido Fawkes has also received the writ, but is also displaying some doctored versions of the image, saying that he “just can’t be bothered with this injunction malarkey”.

Another blogger, Tim Ireland, has already developed an online game, Sheikh Invaders, mocking the tabloid’s attempt to gag the blogosphere. Players zap Mahmoods flying through space.

Other bloggers are engaged in a civil disobedience campaign against the injunction, with some setting up new blogs in the United States or other jurisdictions outside the court’s immediate reach.

A temporary extention to the 24-hour injunction, which Mahmood’s learned friends obtained to buy time for an appeal, is due to expire at 4pm today. Galloway — and presumably an army of bloggers — is expected to publish the picture online, although the News of the World has again appealed to the media not to use the images. This clearly won’t impress some bloggers who hold Mahmood with contempt.
The episode shows how the Internet is making a nonsense of traditional legal mechanisms for controlling the spread of information. It is the second time in a month that the News of the World has learned this the hard way. Remember Ashley Cole?

-

Fear the trolls!

Posted by Martin Stabe on 13 March 2006 at 12:05
Tags: Blogs, Contempt of Court, Guardian, Journalism, Libel

The Guardian’s new blog, Comment Is Free, launches tomorrow.

Ben Hammersley, who has been working on the project, says they are still burning the midnight oil up Farringdon Road putting the finishing touches on the software behind the blog. Still in progresses is a solution to the much-discussed problem of handling blog comments:

Perhaps the most prominent liberal newspaper in the anglophone world, opening a weblog for comment and opinion, with free and open user commenting is, to put it mildly, asking for trouble. Even more so as we come under UK libel law, rather than US. This means that libellous comments left on the site might potentially cost the newspaper a considerable amount of money. No one has ever offered this sort of content to the wider world in this sort of legal, political, or cultural context. This means that we have to employ a whole combination of technological and social countermeasures to make sure that the handful of trolls do not, as they say, ruin it for the rest of us. Frankly, it gives me the fear.

It’s not the first time this has come up. Simon Waldman explained last month that an experiment like this is all about weighing the legal risks against the potential editorial and commercial rewards. Waldman’s major concern, moreover, is contempt of court, not libel.

-

Comment is free, but won’t be anonymous

Posted by Martin Stabe on 13 February 2006 at 10:12
Tags: Blogs, Contempt of Court, Guardian, Libel, Newspapers

The Guardian will soon be launching Comment is Free — a new commentry blog modelled on the Huffington Post.

In his column on Saturday, assistant editor Neil Macintosh revealed that in an effort to avoid the kind of uncivil behaviour that recently forced the Washington Post to shut its blogs’s comments sections, the Guardian site will require readers to register with a valid e-mail address before being allowed to comment.

But that’s not the only feature they may be implementing to promote accountability:

We are also thinking of revealing on the site every commenter’s rough geographical location; information not exposed to the public before. Experiments on other sites suggest debates are more civil when everyone knows where everyone else is.

Interesting. One site that already uses geolocation in this way is Topix.net. In an interview for PBS MediaShift, Topix.net chief executive Rich Skrenta told Mark Glaser:

The geolocation technology we use is 99% accurate on a country level, 80% accurate on a state level, and 75% accurate for U.S. cities. Often for a wrong city it still gets the right “neck of the woods� for a poster. It says I’m in San Francisco when I’m actually in Palo Alto. It is finding the location of the poster’s ISP, not the poster themselves, which can be surprising.

Assuming the Guardian is playing with similar geolocation tools — which are being used increasingly by advertisers and are availble on simple web statistics tools like Google Analytics and even Sitemeter — I suspect Comment is Free will find a huge contingent of commenters from Lambeth, were, judging from the geolocation feature in my own logs, many London ISPs seem to be based. A commenter on my personal blog, where this is cross-posted, explained why:

The Lambeth effect is no doubt due to the fact that LINX is located in Tookey Street, SE1.

LINX is the internet exchange used by many of the major Internet Service Providers.

Meanwhile, the Guardian’s director of digital publishing, Simon Waldman has written a blog post about the legal risks the Guardian is taking by letting commenters post directly to their web site. It’s worth a read, because the same issues arise for every publication that allows readers to comment unmoderated on their web sites.

2 comments

-

Advertisement

E-mail Newsletter Signup

-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement