Main Page Content:
GuardianRSS feed
-

Additional links for Thursday

Posted by Martin Stabe on 12 October 2006 at 16:02
Tags: Digg, Guardian, Guardian Media Group, Journalism

-

Liveblogging the UK AOP conference

Posted by Martin Stabe on 4 October 2006 at 09:59
Tags: Craigslist, Guardian, Journalism, Online, UK AOP

9:30 I’m at UK Association of Online Publishers’ conference in London, where outgoing chairman, Haymarket’s Bill Murray, has just welcomed Simon Waldman of Guardian Media Group as the new chairman.

Waldman says AOP has changed dramatically from its start four years ago, when, he says, it was little more than a group of shoulders for online publishers to cry on because nobody in our business cares about the Internet.

“These are exciting and frightening times for the media owners,” Waldman says, as “traditional business models begin to creak”.

“We are all beginners”, says Waldman. “Rarely has there been a time when so many have faced so much radical change.”

9:40 As an example of what Waldman said, the BBC’s Torin Douglas recaps two stories from the Today programme that underline Waldman’s points: the impending launch of online TV station 18 Doughty Street and Blair and Brown’s agreement not to increase the BBC licence fee above the rate of inflation, along with yesterday’s news from Nielson/Netratings about lack of consumer awareness about new media terms.

9:45 Carolyn McCall, chief executive of GMG, begins her keynote.

McCall says the Guardian’s online video offerings will consist of more than just video content from PA or Reuters. Instead, original video from the group’s production company Guardian Films will be edited for use on the web.

The Guardian is to be the leading liberal voice in the world, says McCall. It is both a creative and commercial goal. This is only possible because of the Internet. Inconcievable 5 years ago. Engement with users is essential to remaining relevant if puiblishers don’t want to be mere content providers for aggregators.

10:15: In the Q&A, McCall is asked how journalists have responded to the Guardian’s digitial strategy. “Journalists are curious peoplep and are curious about the new way of working, so they are not a monolithic or homog greoup,” she says. Some will always embrace new technology early and see it as another way get their content to a wider audience.

For the rest, journalists don’t like being told what to do. It’s best for publishers to engage with them and explain explain that there is an imperative to do this in order to be a player at all in the future.

“You can’t underestimate how much giving journalists the tools they need helps,” she says, citing the new newsroom for the Manchester Evening News.

-

Sambrook blog goes public

Posted by Martin Stabe on 26 September 2006 at 09:32
Tags: BBC, Blogs, Guardian, Journalism

The BBC’s most-senior internal blogger, director of global news Richard Sambrook, has emerged from behind the Beeb’s firewall. Sambrook, one of the Beeb’s most enthusiastic adopters of blogging, now has a publically-accessioble personal blog called SacredFacts.

Sambrook, like all senior media executives with personal blogs, will have to tread carefully between having interesting things to say without spilling the beans about any of the BBC’s internal plans, pointed out Guardian Unlimited’s Neil McIntosh on his own personal blog, Complete Tosh.

McIntosh recounts that he carefully avoiding tipping the world off about the Guardian’s podcasting plans by discussing his newfound interest in audio equipment earlier this year: “Such is the pace of change in this industry that, earlier this year, even to say I was thinking lots about radio, and what works and what doesn’t, would give a heads-up as to what we were doing. And, although it’s not very 2.0 to say so, that simply wouldn’t be a very smart thing to do.”

Now, about my new obsession with green screens and HDV camcorders … Oh, wait.

1 comment

-

GMG’s Waldman: Indy is ‘not even on my radar’

Posted by Martin Stabe on 11 September 2006 at 18:20
Tags: Guardian, Independent, Journalism

Jemima Kiss of PaidContent.org last week conducted a wide-ranging interview with the newly-promoted Guardian Media Group group director of digital strategy and development, Simon Waldman.

Waldman addresses the challenges facing GMG regionals in developing their web strategies.  He hints that new investments could affect Guardian Unlimited’s profits (£1m this year) and that the major aim now is sustain the site’s revenue growth (up 50 per cent this year) and its plans for warding off competition from Times Online and Telegraph.co.uk — not to mention Yahoo! and Google.
Judging by comments buried right at the end of the interview, though, Waldman isn’t losing any sleep over the print Guardian’s rival in the left-of-centre newspaper market:

The Independent is a tiny little newspaper that has only really got smaller on the web. If they’d really, really got things right very early on they would have had the opportunity, along with us, of punching well above their weight. I’m sure they find they have lots of people reading their content in the US, but really the Independent on the web is Robert Fisk and that’s it. There’s nothing of any interest to anyone, and he’s behind a subscription wall so it’s not that heavily looked at. I can’t remember a single presentation I’ve done in the last 6-7 years where anything the Independent has done has featured as anything like a threat to us. They are not even on my radar.

The Indy has of course, been quite clear about the web-scepticism that has led it to have a far less ambitious online presence than the other quality newspapers. But Press Gazette understands that Fisk is actually a surprisingly big money-spinner the Indy’s low-key web site. Subscription walls may be an unfashionable strategy, but the Indy seems content to collect the revenue rather than enduring the decade of costly online investment that others have only recently begun to recoup.

-

Alan Rusbridger, auf Deutsch

Posted by Martin Stabe on 27 June 2006 at 16:49
Tags: Guardian, Journalism

Alan Rusbridger’s explaination of the Guardian’s web-first policy, which first appeared in last week’s Press Gazette, has been translated into German and can now be read on the web site of the newsmagazine Der Spiegel.

-

Greenslade, the blog

Posted by Martin Stabe on 25 May 2006 at 21:35
Tags: Blogs, Guardian, Journalism

It seems the secret is out: A Roy Greenslade blog is up and running at the Guardian.

-

We Media: show us the money

Posted by Martin Stabe on 4 May 2006 at 16:44
Tags: Blogs, Guardian, Journalism, Online, We Media

All this Web 2.0 and blogging discussion at the We Media Global Forum is all well and good, but the question on every editor’s lips is “where’s the money?”. The next discussion here at the Reuters HQ in Canary Wharf will address this ever-tricky issue.

Moderated by Newsnight economics editor Stephanie Flanders, the panel will include a number of people who should have a pretty good idea about how to make money online:

Mainstream media are charactured as being defensive about this, says Flanders. Other side says “If you build it, they will come” attitude — build tools and worry about the money first. (more…)

-

Rusbridger’s ‘Messianic gleam’ for the net

Posted by Martin Stabe on 2 May 2006 at 12:26
Tags: Guardian, Journalism, Online

Speaking with the Arabic paper Asharq Alawsat this weekend, Guardian editor Alan Rusbridger explains the origins of his paper’s enthusiasm for the Internet:

Back in 1993, Carolyn McCall who is the managing director and I got involved with a magazine called Wire, which is a kind of bible for the internet and was published over here for a while. I made a couple of trips to America in the early nineties and came back with a kind of Messianic gleam in my eye and told others about this extraordinary thing that was going on there, so both of us came at it independently. We did not make the mistake of going in at a ridiculous level. We did not do what others did, shoot it and then have to cut back. We went in at a reasonable level. Also, we did not simply replicate the paper online, I think that’s what a lot of people do, they just put the paper up and treated it as though it’s the same medium. We did not do that.

The man with the “messianic gleam” also told Asharq Alawsat that he isn’t sure whether newspapers are doomed. He’s keeping an eye on the emergence of e-paper, though: “If somebody invents plastic paper, which I think has happened already, and you find something that is readable in sunlight, has long battery power and is refreshable then that spells the end of [newspapers] sooner. If not then [newspapers] I think will be round for many years yet but the economic model that supports this will change.”

1 comment

-

Are journalists ‘irrational, incompetent egomaniacs’?

Posted by Martin Stabe on 25 April 2006 at 11:29
Tags: BBC, Guardian, Journalism

On Comment is free, former minister and long-time NUJ member Denis Macshane repeats some recent calls for Guardian columnist Polly Toynbee to reveal her pay packet:

Ultimately, I would go further than ID cards. The best defence for progress and freedom is transparency. In Nordic countries everyone’s tax returns are published. Having enjoyed Polly Toynbee’s appeal for pay transparency I am still waiting for the Guardian to list the salary, allowances and expenses of all its staff. Curious how Freedom of Information legislation applies everywhere except to the press. Ending money secrecy, as we have ended secrecy over who owns land or shares, is a new theoretical challenge for progressive politics. Privacy has always been the defence behind which stand privilege.

Meanwhile, Chris Dillow at Stumbling and Mumbling examines the economic theories that might explain why Toynbee collects about four times as much from the Guardian as he does from Investors Chronicle.

One of the more controvertial ideas Dillow suggests is that journalists are engaged in a labour market tournament:

Young people don’t become journalists because they want to earn £17,000 a year on Local Authority Plant and Vehicle or Pig World. They do so because they hope to become a star columnist. Paying star columnists big money can therefore be a way of attracting cheap enthusiastic labour into the dead tree business.

It’s not a new theme for Dillow, who has previously compared the economics of journalism to those of drug dealing. The idea of a labour market tournament as applied to drug dealers is famously outlined by economist Stephen Levitt in his bestseller Freakonomics, where he uses it to explain why gangers live with their mothers. Only a handful at the top live anything approximating the stereotypical bling-bling lifestyle. Their vast army of underlings survive on poverty wages and endure the extreme risks of their career for the chance to rise to the top.

Responding to Jeremy Paxman’s advice to Oxbridge graduates not to follow in his footsteps, Dillow last November argued that young journalists behave a bit like the Chicago crack dealers studied by Levitt: “What motivates people are not the rewards for doing the job in itself — these are low — but rather the rewards for winning”.

Only “irrational incompetent egomaniacs”, Dillow suggests, would chose a high-risk career tournament like this.

But this is probably a serious misreading of what motivates young journalists. Surely lurking in every newsroom are a few “irrational egomaniacs” who accept poverty wages, live with their parents, and dream of one day commanding Paxmanesque wages from the BBC or even the more, er, modest income Toybee’s slot on the Graun allegedly commands.

If the Toynbee-Macshane proposal for total transparency in journalistic pay was somehow enacted, young journalists’ career choices would suddenly be informed by more perfect information, and a few of Dillow’s “incompetent egomaniacs” would make the “rational” jump to a stable, better-paid career in PR sooner rather than later.

“Naive idealist” is probably a more suitable epithet for most cub reporters — but the dismal science has no way of accounting for that sort of motivation. Discuss.

-

Transparency for thee but not for me?

Posted by Martin Stabe on 24 April 2006 at 14:54
Tags: BBC, Guardian, Journalism, Sunday Telegraph

Sunday Telegraph Mandrake diarist Tim Walker has called on Polly Toynbee to  disclose her salary after the Guardian columnist responded to the the recent furores over NHS GPs’ and BBC presenters’ pay with a column calling for the UK to follow the Scandinavian practice of making individuals’ tax returns public records.

She has, so far, refused. Westminster blogger Guido Fawkes, however, believes Toynbee trousers £140,000 from the Graun.

Next Posts Previous Posts

-

Advertisement

E-mail Newsletter Signup

-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement