Main Page Content:
CNETRSS feed
-

@NMK: Big media and interactivity

Posted by Martin Stabe on 13 June 2007 at 12:22
Tags: BBC, CNET, Channel 4, Guardian Unlimited, Journalism, NMK

This morning’s panel at the New Media Knowledge Forum at St Luke’s on Old Street is looking at “how the MSM (Mainstream Media) facing up to the new wave of interest in social media?”

  • Jem Stone: BBC New Media
  • Tom Bureau: Managing Director, CNET Networks UK
  • Meg Pickard: Head of Editorial development, Guardian Unlimited
  • Adam Gee: New Media Commissioner, Factual at Channel 4 Television
  • Paul Pod: Co-Founder, TIOTI (Tape It Off The Internet)
  • Ashley Norris: Co-founder, Shiny Media
  • Nico Macdonald: Spy.co.uk
  • Jeff Revoy, VP of Search and Social Media, Yahoo! Europe

Nothing really earth-shattering was said in what should have been an excellent panel. Still, some highlights:

Gee: Traditional are media are well-positioned to do public tasks by providing the architecture for interactive projects. He points to a Channel 4 map of public artwork being created by “a willing public” armed with cameraphones.

Revoy: The development of interactive tools online is being driven by the growth of broadband penetration and the wide availability of applications. It’s not a trend, just evolution of the medium. In a few years’ time, it won’t be considered a trend, but will just be the way people interact with the internet.

Bureau: CNET uses “architecture of participation” to solicit and encourage high-value users’ interaction on its web sites and that their contributions are treated in a similar vein as the contributions from the professional journalists on their sites. What professional journalists create is just the starting point, and a challenge is to change the way they look at the world and relate to their users to reflect that. Silicon.com, for example caters for high-level technology executives. The question has to be who knows more about the subject — a journalist or some members of such a specialst audience. When you have a specialist audience, you’ll inevitably have a proportion — perhaps 10 to 20 per cent — who are greater expects. They may not have the presentation skills to express that knowledge as well as the journalists, though.

Pickard: The Guardian is becoming more “granular” in its thinking about user interactivity. She outlined various classes of user interactivity, starting with casual, passive viewers, followed by interaction (such as leaving comments), curation, and finally content creation. Many big media organiations are still only getting the first chunk. The trick is to find ways to move people from being mere consumers to more creators. This should be a fundimental part of the proposition.

Norris: Lot of journalists despise new media, because they are accustomed to delivering tablets of stone, and this is still something that affects most news organisations. He singles out the Daily Mail and the Sun for frequently picking up stories from blogs, but rarely links out from their sites to acknowledge them. Even the BBC, he says, rarely links to the many blogs in the British blogosphere.

Stone: Responding to Norris, he says this may not be because the journalists don’t respect the bloggers, but just because they aren’t aware of their posts. Norris retorts: “That’s like saying journalists aren’t aware of news stories.”

See also: Kevin Anderson, Jemima Kiss, Robin Hamman.

3 comments

-

All the news that’s fit to Twit

Posted by Martin Stabe on 21 March 2007 at 13:54
Tags: BBC, British Press Awards, CNET, CNET News.com, CNN, Guardian Unlimited, Journalism, Mashups, New York Times, Press Association, Wired, twitter

Just in time for its first anniversary last week, the Twitter has gained a huge surge in attention to go with accelerating growth in its user base.

The service, which combines social networking and blogging, allow users to send 140-character updates detailing what they are doing at the moment. Users can chose to have their friends’ messages delivered directly to an instant massager account or mobile phone via text message.

Helped by a flurry of adoption among the digerati at TED and SXSW conferences, Twitter has become the current darling among the usual early-adopter crowd — and has frustrated some by slowing down tremendously as a consequence.

Twitter invites users to reply to the question “What are you doing right now?” It then sends the responses — by RSS, IM or, crucially, mobile phone — to all of those friends who have signed up to follow that user’s messages.

Inevitably, this invitation has meant that the service is being used primarily for communicating the most banal aspects of everyday life — and this has led to a Marmite-like devision of opinion among the online commentariat.

Some A-list bloggers are contemplating shifting most of their everyday writing to the service. Weblogs Inc founder Jason Calacanis, for example, announced that “90% of my blogging is now on Twitter”, prompting howls of disapproving comments from some of his regular readers.

While the enthusiasts can’t get enough Twittering, its detractors are equally unflinching.

“Of all the masturbatory ego-fluffers on the Web, nothing chafes me worse than Twitter,” complained Steve Bryant of eWeek. “Not content with blogging — itself a microchunked, short-form version of diary keeping — we’ve taken to journaling the minute-by-minute factlets and factoids of our bite-sized lives.”

Like the blogging naysayers, the Twitter-haters are absolutely right when they complain that 99 per cent of the communication produced with the service is utter rubbish. Even the closest of friends are probably not interested in receiving a text message every time one of their mates farts.

But by focusing on the banality of most Twitter messages, the service’s critics are guilty of the same logical error as those who dismiss blogging because of the stupidity they observe in many bloggers: they confuse medium and message, technology and content.

Twitter may be encouraging its early adopters to use the service in a relatively banal form of content, but technology adoption never works out quite as the developers of new services imagined or even intended.

The technical idea underlying Twitter is interesting: It is a gateway service that lets users easily post and receive between three normally incompatible short-messaging services: web site comments, instant messaging and SMS text messages.

And like many of the Web 2.0 sites, Twitter has been clever about encouraging such unintended uses, by providing an API that makes it easy for skilled users to find innovative uses for the service.

Anil Dash of Six Apart, put it well when he wrote on his blog: “The sign of success in social software is when your community does something you didn’t expect. “

And that is certainly happening. US presidential hopeful John Edwards is using Twitter to keep supporters abreast of his campaign.

One user has created service that automatically provides service updates for the London Underground.

And of course, many people have seen the potential of the service for distributing news alerts. The Press Association announced last week that it would be using Twitter to distribute updates of Gordon Brown’s budget announcement today.

PA’s experiment is not the first attempt to use Twitter as a vehicle for distributing news, but what’s unusual about it is that it is being produced in-house rather than by their enthusiastic readers.

A few months ago, Twitter user Mario Menti created a mashup that ports the latest headlines from CNN and the BBC into Twitter, allowing users to receive headlines and links to breaking news headlines on their mobile phones by joining the publication’s network of Twitter friends.

A similar service have appeared for Google News headlines. Blogger Dave Winer created a Twitter headline service for Wired after a journalist at the magazine suggested it on one of the magazine’s blogs. The New York Times has both an official Twitter account and another one produced by Dave Winer. There is what looks like an official Twitter feed for technology site CNET News.com.

While I was writing this post, my phone chirped with a Twitter message from Guardian blogs editor Kevin Anderson revealing that something Twitter-related is afoot at Graun towers as well.

Of course, we’re not beyond jumping on the Twitter bandwagon ‘round here. Next Monday evening, you’ll be able to get the British Press Awards winners on your mobile phone as they are announced. Just follow the user ‘pressgazette‘ on Twitter.

Update: Even political blogger Guido Fawkes seems to be Twittering.

Update 22/3: The Guardian’s Twitter feeds, created by Ben Hammersley, are ‘guardiannews‘ and ‘commentisfree‘. Simon Dickson notes that Nick Robinson’s frantic budget micro-blogging for the BBC might have been a good use for Twitter (a bit like PA’s experiment, perhaps).

Update 23/3: Jack Lail ponders the journalistic applications of Twitter.

8 comments

-

Wired joins rush to Second Life

Posted by Martin Stabe on 18 October 2006 at 09:32
Tags: CNET, Journalism, Reuters, Second Life, Wired

Wired magazine has become the lastest real-world news organisation to establish an office Second Life, the 3D virtual world.

The magazine joins Reuters, which opened a virtual bureau this week, and online publisher CNET, which opened its Second Life building last month.

Last Friday, Wired editor-in-chief Chris Anderson, author of The Long Tail, gave a presentation and virtual book signing in Second Life, and the current issue of the magazine features a trave guide and fact sheet about Second Life.

1 comment

-

Reuters to open virtual bureau in Second Life

Posted by Martin Stabe on 15 October 2006 at 23:01
Tags: BBC, CNET, Journalism, Reuters, Second Life

Reuters in Second Life

Reuters is planning to open a bureau in Second Life, the virtual world created by San Francisco-based Linden Labs.

London-based correspondent Adam Pasick will appear in Second Life as the avatar Adam Reuters, reported the International Herald Tribune, following initial reports on the Second Life Herald blog.

More than 850,000 people are registered to participate in Second Life, which was recently the subject of a detailed introduction in the Economist. The in-world currency, the Linden Dollar, can be exchanged for real-world currency on the open market.

As one might expect, Reuters’ Second Life web site tracks Second Life’s key economic indicators, including the Linden Dollar’s fluctuation against real-world currency. According to the Reuters’ site, the rate on Sunday evening was 271.4 Linden Dollars to one US Dollar, and $407,666 had been spent in Second Life over the previous 24 hours. Pasick’s first dispatch as “Reuters SL bureau chief Adam Reuters” was an interview with Nicholas Portocarrero, chief executive of in-world bank Ginko.

Pasick told the IHT: “It’s not any different than when Reuters opens up a bureau in a part of the world that has a fast-growing economy that we weren’t in before. The laws of supply and demand hold true, it has a currency exchange, people open businesses and get paid for goods and services.”

Reuters’ virtual building will appear as a hybrid of its Canary Wharf building and its equivalent in Times Square, New York. Reuters is the second news organisation to establish a presence in the virtual world — after CNET News.com, which unveiled a virtual version of its San Francisco headquarters last month — but it appears to be the first to dedicate a correspondent to report on the phenomenon.

The BBC has also shown interest in Second Life. It has already presented a concert in Second Life, and director general Mark Thompson and new media director Ashley Highfield met with Linden Labs on their recent US “fact-finding mission”. Last week Chris Vallance of BBC Radio FiveLive’s Pods and Blogs conducted an interview in Second Life.

The journalists are late to the game, though — technology PR consultancy Text 100 is already offering virtual spin in-world.

-

Advertisement

E-mail Newsletter Signup

-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement